[lbo-talk] Adolph Reed on the limits of antiracism

[Alan Rudy]

I didn't say this was Reed's argument, I know it isn't. This was in response
to Chuck's question about audience, and I was drawing parallels between the
folks Reed, quite properly, can't stand and folks I've read and met who have
argued that they think those other things are important but can only be
dealt with after the revolution.  My apologies for not being clear... unless
I've misunderstood you.

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


>
> On Oct 24, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Alan Rudy wrote:
>
>  think of Communists who are pretty darned good on race, sex,
>> gender and sexuality but find all of them to be of a status subordinate to
>> and effectively separate from class.  Its all variants of "your stuff is
>> important but secondary so we'll deal with it later thank you very much".
>>
>
> Did you read Adolph's article?
>
> Doug
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

-- 
*********************************************************
Alan P. Rudy
Dept. Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work
Central Michigan University
124 Anspach Hall
Mt Pleasant, MI 48858
517-881-6319