>
> But you just said you were a materialist, which kind of implies the
> insistence that there is a real material world. (?)
>
>
One can be a realist and a materialist. But one could also be a pragmatist
materialist who thinks that talk of the supernatural isn't useful.
>
> --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Alan Rudy <alan.rudy at gmail.com> wrote:
> there is no utility whatsoever in
> > insisting that there is
> > a real material world and semiotic/scientific constructions
> > of it... such a
> > position gains us nothing.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>