Is it even true that a single payer system would disrupt the health care people already have, except perhaps to make it cheaper and more efficient? It would certainly disrupt the vested interests that make the US system so expensive and inefficient.
Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html
--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Chuck Grimes <cgrimes at rawbw.com> wrote:
> From: Chuck Grimes <cgrimes at rawbw.com>
> Subject: [lbo-talk] Obama?
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 3:25 AM
> ``I have to say that there are
> arguments to be made for both approaches.
> But either one would represent a radical shift that would
> disrupt the
> health care most people currently have. ...'' Obama
>
> -------------
>
>
> I am sorry, I thought that reform meant, disrupting what
> most people
> have...
>
> I think this SOB just committed suicide. And he ratted out
> the CBC.
>
> Whether they want to face the consequence or not I don't
> know. My last
> hope is they decide to vote NO
>
> Hello one term.
>
> CG
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>