--- On Fri, 9/18/09, James Leveque <leveque.james at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: James Leveque <leveque.james at gmail.com>
> Subject: [lbo-talk] More on Obama and Facsism
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 7:31 PM
> I'm just throwing this out there to
> see what kind of responses I get. Some
> former Bush official compared Obama's economic policies to
> Hitler and Peron.
> I'm less interested in her confused reading of Obama's
> policies than her
> stated "definition" of fascism.
>
> http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/former-bush-administration-official-warns-against-economic-fascism-under-obama.php?ref=fpblg
>
> "when you look at the definition of fascism. Fascism is not
> government
> ownership of business, it is government control of
> business."
>
> This is a subject I've become recently really interested in
> (so, hence, I
> don't know a lot about it.), but my feeling is that
> economics is a
> problematic way to define fascism because economic policies
> weren't well
> defined under the fascists. Consequently, what Germany was
> doing
> economically wasn't what Italy was doing, which was
> different from some
> other regime like the Falangists. But capitalist businesses
> largely
> flourished under fascism. That being said, it seems like
> most fascist
> regimes weren't above regulation by any means, as long as
> the regulation
> subordinated business to the fascist party. Is this at
> least somewhat
> accurate?
>
> James Leveque
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>