--- On Sat, 9/19/09, RicardoStarkey at aol.com <RicardoStarkey at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes, age has a lot to do with it. It's one
> thing for ancient, cherished
> myths to be passed down and modified century after
> century. It's quite
> another to fabricate an entire book out of whole
> cloth, claiming that an angel
> pointed you to some ancient plates that you managed
> to translate with the
> aid of some magical instruments. Of course,
> none of it makes much sense,
> but at least Catholics can admire a long history of
> myth-making, which
> started back when the term "myth" didn't have the
> connotation of being
> anti-Enlightenment, anti-rational. What's to admire
> in the myths of the Mormon
> church, which were invented by a small handful of
> Anglo-American men within the
> last couple of hundred years? (Not to mention
> the bit about the
> indigenous peoples of the Americas being cursed with
> dark pigmentation because of
> their wickedness.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>