[lbo-talk] Doris Walker and Ann Gagan Ginger

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 23 21:51:22 PDT 2009


Doris was Prez of the NLG in the 1940s, first woman to head a major bar association. I saw her at NLG 70th in 1997, she was 90-something, we gave her an award. She told the following story: She was from Texas, where everyone has a nickname. Hers was Dobby. A friend of her was a friend of J K Rowling, and when the mutual friend mentioned her friend Dobby, Rowling fell in love with the namre and appropriated for the militant house elf in Harry Potter whom, after his own liberation, tries (with little success) to organize the other house elves, who are content in their servitude. She swore this was the origin of the name of the character. It is fitting. Andie

--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Chuck Grimes <cgrimes at rawbw.com> wrote:


> From: Chuck Grimes <cgrimes at rawbw.com>
> Subject: [lbo-talk] Doris Walker and Ann Gagan Ginger
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 8:19 PM
> I was asked about Doris Brin Walker
> and Ann Gagan Ginger today, and I
> had completely forgotten them. I didn't know them. They
> were two radical
> Berkeley lawyers who made important contributions to civil
> rights, human
> rights, keeping government honest, stopping the endless
> stream of legal
> and physical abuse coming from the state, etc. They were
> very active in
> 60s rad politics here.
>
> My memory must be melting away faster than the polar caps.
> I was sure I
> remembered something on them in the lbo archives...sure
> enough. See
> below obit note on Walker which Dennis Claxton posted.
>
> Below is a link to an interview with Ann Ginger:
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=713215581291529425#
>
> While I was looking around at the Meikeljohn Institute I
> suddenly
> started to remember all kinds of legal work and actions of
> the 60s-70s.
> This work and its concepts were `in the air', and in the
> speeches and
> acted as a training guide to both radical politics and
> radical action.
> Michael Tigar must have known them and or worked for them
> in some way.
> They set up the background to understand the Free Speech
> Movement.
>
> Of course a lot of demonstrations were just rallies that
> may or may not
> end with police violence. But there were other
> demonstrations and
> speeches that were true training system to communicate what
> an earlier
> generation like Walker and Ginger had learned.
>
> Doris Walker's most famous trial was as defence attorney
> for Anglia
> Davis. The obit was posted when Dennis Claxton asked about
> a book about
> Doris Walker.
>
> ``...From 1961 to 1977, Walker was a partner in a law
> practice with
> Robert Treuhaft, a prominent leftist who was married to
> Walker's close
> friend, writer Jessica Mitford. The firm, Treuhaft, Walker
> and
> Burnstein, hired Hillary Rodham, the future first lady and
> secretary of
> State, as an intern in 1971...''
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-doris-walker23-2009aug23,0,4522095.story
>
>
> What I want to say about both Walker and Ginger is what
> tremendous
> teachers they were. When Walker would hold a news
> conference, she used
> the opportunity to lecture on the law and the state. So the
> trial became
> a demonstration project to educate the people on their
> rights, the use
> of those rights and how to fight back against government
> and capital.
>
> I would urge people to click on video link and listen. You
> will see
> immediately what I am talking about. Ginger teaches the
> interviewer, and
> the audience. For example, she explains how to report
> police misconduct
> on the Mexican border to the US government and the UN
> special rapporteur
> for human rights. What's important about these reports is
> that they are
> formally reviewed by the UN and the numbers of cases are
> made public.
> These numbers show how big the problem is and whether or
> not there is a
> systematic policy of abuse. It is really good stuff. These
> statistics
> are also important as legal documentation and are used in
> US courts
> against the government.
>
> She explains the UN charters are treaties, and the US
> constitution says
> that treaties are enforced by the US government. Therefore
> the
> provisions against civil and human rights are also US law.
>
>
> What's strange about all this for me, is I realize that
> many of my
> concepts and thoughts on how to change society came from
> these two
> women. These were the concepts and ideas that were `in the
> air' when I
> was in my twenties. I learned them so long ago, I forgot
> where they came
> from.
>
> I bring this up because that's what we need more of today
> to
> re-construct a left movement. If you listen to the video,
> notice that
> Ginger de-constructs the entire rightwing agenda.
>
> We talk about theory and its relationship to practice.
> Walker and Ginger
> show us how to do that through legal theory. In a manner of
> speaking,
> the theory of our society is to be found in its legal
> constructs, so if
> we want to change the society, we have to perform that
> change through
> the legal constructs that found it. The first example that
> popped into
> my mind was that corporations are virtual people and
> therefore have
> rights, therefore making campaign contributions protected
> speech?
>
> They reminded me of other things I used to think about and
> forgot. The
> apparently empty slogan, Think global, Act locally, for
> example. Now go
> back and think about what Ginger was saying about the UN
> and US law.
> See? She was acting locally with state/federal case law, by
> thinking
> through the global sphere of UN laws and charters.
>
> Another thing that Walker and Ginger added was the way to
> focus on
> issues of the day, and make a few critical items do a lot
> of the heavy
> lifting work of raising public awareness. For example the
> illegal nature
> of government action in prisoner abuse cases goes a long
> way towards
> explaining what's wrong with concept of a war on terror.
> Wars are by
> definition conflicts between two or more states. In the war
> on terror
> there is only one state actor and its action are in
> addition illegal.
> The authorization by written up by the executive branch is
> illegal, and
> more.
>
> There are even fewer radical business/economics lawyers,
> but we could
> use some to de-construct the nonsense that there is such a
> thing as
> jobless recoveries...
>
> This is getting too long...
>
> CG
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list