>shag did you not see what I wrote right after the part that you chose to
>focus on and misinterpret?
You could see that coming. Do you not remember writing things like this:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20100201/001793.html
>So, the underlining assumptions are that the tea-parties are
>monolithic, ignorant, have completely different grievances then
>'real people', and...should be what...sent to the gulags??? If there
>is going to be a rise of fascism out of this it will only be because
>the left is too elite and self-righteous to reach out and convince
>people with very real problems that this is not the way forward. Have fun.