On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:00, Max Sawicky <sawicky at verizon.net> wrote:
> Those numbers are problematic. Tax data are attributed to the address
> on the form, but that is not necessarily the filer's home address. It
> could be his/her tax preparer. On the spending side, a contractor
> operating in a state where the project is need not live in the state,
> nor need its shareholders if the company is public. The workers in a
> state need not live there either.
>
> There is also the time disconnect. Somebody paying payroll tax for SS
> & Medicare could retire to another state and get benefits there.
>
> Oh, and this info is from the Tax Foundation, and they suck.
> I haven't read their study -- go ahead and sue me -- if somebody
> has and can flag a mistake in what I said, feel free to respond.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>> James Heartfield was skeptical when I claimed that the most Republican,
>> anti-government states in the U.S. got more in federal aid than they paid to
>> Washington in taxes, and vice versa. Here's a map making my case:
>>
>> http://www.thefourthbranch.com/2010/04/government-spending/
>>
>> Doug
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>