>
> On Apr 11, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Matthias Wasser wrote:
>
> If I were a neoconservative grasping for "good wars," I suppose I couldn't
>> do that much better than the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia (not that Ho
>> was around at the time.) Could I?
>>
>
> Do you have to be a neocon? The U.S. opposed that invasion, and to me, it
> wasn't an entirely bad thing.
Well, I don't know shit about the specifics, but yeah, given that it removed Pol Pot from power, it obviously "wasn't an entirely bad thing."
Wikipedia says it started when the Cambodians invaded an island and stone cold executed 500 civilians. Damn.