For a rough sketch of post-capitalist economics *The Activist's* theory section has a few articles of note ("On Economic Democracy" and Schulman's rejoinder) : http://theactivist.org/blog/category/theory .
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Somebody Somebody <philos_case at yahoo.com>wrote:
> Yeah, I don't really get the whole "sustainability" argument. Look, welfare
> states have been nibbled at and compromised for the past 30 years, but it's
> not as if we've returned to the 19th century. Thatcher couldn't abolish the
> NHS. Sweden still has free higher education. Germany after Schröder still
> has work councils.
>
>
> On the other hand, the former communist countries really have returned to
> capitalism. Which is more sustainable in the end, social democratic reforms
> that keep private property in place, or extensive nationalization of the
> commanding heights of the economy, which seems inevitably to lead to a
> return to capitalism? The golden age has passed for both social democracy
> and socialism. But, given the fact that social democracy has a more vigorous
> legacy in the year 2010, I would say it's highly debatable that it should be
> rubbished in favor of the same old leftist dogmas.
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>