[lbo-talk] agricultural productivity

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 19 06:48:04 PDT 2010


I think people are conflating technological development and capitalism, which are different things. They have often been dependent on each other, but they are different.  

----- Original Message ---- From: brad bauerly <bbauerly at gmail.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 5:27:06 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] agricultural productivity

Michael wrote:

Agricutural productivity depends upon the metric you use.  The most common is output per unit of labor.  So you get an innovation, such as the short handled hoe, to drive workers harder.

Is that an improvement? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You also get the mechanical reaper, which increased the productivity of wheat production by at least 7 fold and decreased the sweat and backbreaking work of harvesting.

Is that an improvement?  Or do you think it better to have seven people harvesting the wheat?  If so, which seven?  Are you going to volunteer yourself to give up the benefits?

I think any attempt to paint everything to come out of capitalist agriculture, or capitalism, as bad is really dangerous for the left. Clearly there are very bad things and some good things.  To say it again, the point is to appropriate the good and transform the bad.

Brad ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list