I don't get it.
So... in your scheme, not only are public subsidies directed to capitalists' enterprises (a normal affair, of course), but the state becomes the enforcer of wage suppression across the industry? This is a good idea... how? How, under any scenario, are workers not worse off?
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Sandy Harris <sandyinchina at gmail.com> wrote:
> I read something a couple of decades back, not now sure where, that
> seemed to me to make sense. I thought I'd throw it out here; see if
....