[lbo-talk] forcing 9/11 "balance" at Pacifica

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 27 09:55:37 PDT 2010


I just can't take anybody seriously who believes this. It's like wearing your bike helmet backward.  

----- Original Message ---- From: Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 8:33:38 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] forcing 9/11 "balance" at Pacifica

On Apr 27, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Sean Andrews wrote:


> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:17, Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9-11/Anthrax, there are in fact only two "sides."  Bush/Cheney, complicit
>> or not?  Why are you so totally certain of their innocence? Based on what
>> facts?


>>  It's just really good to keep asking these
> questions--good, that is, for keeping us from asking any that are
> actually important.

So, if *you* were to spend a few minutes seriously considering the relationship between the 9/11  and anthrax terrorisms,  and the Bush/Cheney obstruction of any public inquiry into those two crimes,  just what "important questions" would it keep *you* from asking a few minutes later?

Shane Mage The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list