[lbo-talk] WikiLeaks: What is it good for?

Homo indy homoindetermin at aim.com
Mon Aug 23 13:17:31 PDT 2010


On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Michael Pollak wrote:


> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Andy wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately the revelation of informants' names is a perfectly defensible worry. They also worry about the revelation about SOP. Yes, they hate revelation period. But the laziness of Wikileaks gave them sound grounds.
>>
>> I thought they ran it by the administration to give them a chance to redact names.
>
> No, not at all, quite the opposite.

Actually yes, they did. Glenn Greenwald has dealt with this in detail:

<http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/08/20/wikileaks>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list