The Dimitrov definition was wrong when it was formulated over the objection across two plenums of many delegates with actual direct experience with fascism in its stage as a mass movement.
It was simplistic, factually false, and ideologically-motivated.
It was crap then and it is crap now.
-Chip
^^^^^ CharlesB: Blunt back at you. What's wrong with it ? Asserting baldfacedly without argument that it's wrong is soooo unimpressive it makes me laugh. Dimitrov had experience fighting fascism directly , too, no ? Like he was tried for the Reichstag fire.
The "open terrorist rule" part is so obviously _factually_ correct you sound ridiculous calling it wrong. What's the class analysis in your definition ? What's your theory or ideology ?