>> Shakespeare was a thorough-going reactionary and upholder of aristocratic privilege
>
> Is that supposed to be satirical? Am I missing the irony?
> Shakespeare was not a reactionary, he was as Harold Bloom
> rightly says, one of the key figures in the invention of the human.
Oh, okay. But he was an awful anti-Semite. C'mon, I've got you there.
--
Michael Smith mjs at smithbowen.net http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com