[lbo-talk] Neanderthals used cosmetics

[Chris Doss]

Not only that, it's a racist insult. James hates Neanderthals and all lesser peoples. That's why he likes Conrad. As a Brit, he yearns for the Empire, when progressive peoples could oppress lesser, reactionary peoples (Neanderthals = Indians and Blacks), which is why he hates the Continent and Germans and their Lederhosen. This is also why he denies climate change, because climate = nature = primitiveness = Indians and Blacks, and British people should be able to do whatever they want with the climate/nature/Indians/Blacks. So, James is a racist, like Conrad.

I love Heartfieldian logic. You can use it to prove anything. You just kind of transmute your free associations into reality.

----- Original Message ----
From: Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com>
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Sent: Mon, January 18, 2010 6:14:34 AM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Neanderthals used cosmetics

It's also a spectacularly stupid, junior high school level insult.

----- Original Message ----
From: Matthias Wasser <matthias.wasser at gmail.com>
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Sent: Mon, January 18, 2010 12:52:00 AM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Neanderthals used cosmetics

On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


>
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 3:43 PM, James Heartfield wrote:
>
>  Your dream date then, Chris
>>
>
> I don't want to impose a duty to be constructive on this list, but was that
> really necessary?

Have you been paying attention? That might have been the nicest thing either
of them has said to the other since the Heidegger thread.
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

      

___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk