My mantra on Clinton, he did four good things: expanded the EITC, created SCHIP, and I forget the other two. Not clear that Bush the Elder would have been worse. Bush II was clearly better on social spending.
>
> So Max, are you saying social spending was better under Bush I and Bush II
> than it was under Clinton? Or are there crucial differences in the
> subcategories?
>
> Michael
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>