On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:07 PM, SA wrote:
> I'm not trying to deny that the party did all these good things. I'm just saying that they didn't *appear* to amount to all that much at the time. What looks to you in retrospect like "sustained and nationally coordinated activity" looked at the time like scattered local actions, stirred up by a CP that had - what, 10,000 members?
10,000 is not small. Adjusted for pop growth, it'd be 25,000 now. If only we had that.
Doug