[lbo-talk] green consumers: thieving pricks

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 10:42:52 PDT 2010


[WS:] It could well be that this is a spurious connection. People who can afford to be "green consumers" tend to be more of upper middle class or "yuppie" background than people who buy conventional products (which are far less expensive.) So what the authors attribute to be a "going green" effect is in fact an effect of upper class arrogance.

Wojtek

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


> Guardian - March 15, 2010
> <
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/15/green-consumers-more-likely-steal
> >
>
> How going green may make you mean
> Ethical consumers less likely to be kind and more likely to steal, study
> finds
>
> Kate Connolly in Berlin
>
> When Al Gore was caught running up huge energy bills at home at the same
> time as lecturing on the need to save electricity, it turns out that he was
> only reverting to "green" type.
>
> According to a study, when people feel they have been morally virtuous by
> saving the planet through their purchases of organic baby food, for example,
> it leads to the "licensing [of] selfish and morally questionable behaviour",
> otherwise known as "moral balancing" or "compensatory ethics".
>
> Do Green Products Make Us Better People is published in the latest edition
> of the journal Psychological Science. Its authors, Canadian psychologists
> Nina Mazar and Chen-Bo Zhong, argue that people who wear what they call the
> "halo of green consumerism" are less likely to be kind to others, and more
> likely to cheat and steal. "Virtuous acts can license subsequent asocial and
> unethical behaviours," they write.
>
> The pair found that those in their study who bought green products appeared
> less willing to share with others a set amount of money than those who
> bought conventional products. When the green consumers were given the chance
> to boost their money by cheating on a computer game and then given the
> opportunity to lie about it – in other words, steal – they did, while the
> conventional consumers did not. Later, in an honour system in which
> participants were asked to take money from an envelope to pay themselves
> their spoils, the greens were six times more likely to steal than the
> conventionals.
>
> Mazar and Zhong said their study showed that just as exposure to pictures
> of exclusive restaurants can improve table manners but may not lead to an
> overall improvement in behaviour, "green products do not necessarily make
> for better people". They added that one motivation for carrying out the
> study was that, despite the "stream of research focusing on identifying the
> 'green consumer'", there was a lack of understanding into "how green
> consumption fits into people's global sense of responsibility and morality
> and [how it] affects behaviours outside the consumption domain".
>
> The pair said their findings surprised them, having thought that just as
> "exposure to the Apple logo increased creativity", according to a recent
> study, "given that green products are manifestations of high ethical
> standards and humanitarian considerations, mere exposure" to them would
> "activate norms of social responsibility and ethical conduct".
>
> Dieter Frey, a social psychologist at the University of Munich, said the
> findings fitted patterns of human behaviour. "At the moment in which you
> have proven your credentials in a particular area, you tend to allow
> yourself to stray elsewhere," he said.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list