And of course you're right about materialism and theism. Christianity's Ur-heresy was (and remains) Gnosticism, an anti-materialism. --CGE
Chris Doss wrote:
> Well, it seems to me that the Reformation and Enlightenment are not so much
> in a parent-child relationship as they are brother and sister (cf. Luther and
> Erasmus, Correspondence Between). Both were reactions to what they saw as an
> ossified and perverted tradition and turned away from the institutions of
> that tradition (and both went way too far in the process).
>
> I mean, look at Hobbes. He was both what we would think of as a
> Fundamentalist and what we would think of as a precursor to the modern
> scientific worldview (I'm tempted to get into a digression on how materialism
> and theism do not contradict each other, but am not going to).
>
>
> ----- Original Message ---- From: C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu>
>
> Our hermeneutic took a strange turn with the rise of capitalism. The
> interaction was surely complex. An aspect of the process is set out in a
> brilliant recent book by James Simpson, Burning to Read: English
> Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents (Harvard UP 2007) - “a landmark
> in the study of fundamentalism. In James Simpson's radical reassessment, the
> Protestant Reformation appears not as a parent of the Enlightenment, but
> rather as a progenitor of the extreme and intolerant literalism that has
> seized every major world religion today” (Amitav Ghosh).
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk