So I guess that Parenti, as exhbited in a selection of remarks from this thread, is in fact an aggressive idealist, proceding on the assumption that ideas have a history of their own independent of social actuality.
My eyes are getting really bad, and I have not attempted to read the thread completely or read more than scattered pieces carefully.
Carrol
^^^^^^^^ CB: In my contact with Parenti over the years, he's been as connected to struggles to change the world and social actuality as people here and most college profs, including Carrol. As book writers go, I'd say he's more involved in practical critical activity than most.