>as far as i can tell, people blew a phrase from the reviewer way out
>of proportion to what parenti was up to. he's not interested in
>questions of biblical literalism or inerrancy - not in a
>philosophical sense. he's simply interested in the dominant trends
>among the christian right, the most widely read translation they use
>(King James) and how they have crafted a god that
>advances/reinforces capitalist ideology.
So he's not a New Atheist at all then.