[lbo-talk] the communitarian case for drones

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Tue Mar 30 14:46:38 PDT 2010


[I always hated this communitarian shit, but this takes the cake. For some reason this asshole added me to his email list.]

From: Amitai Etzioni <icps at GWU.EDU> Date: March 30, 2010 5:03:51 PM EDT To: COMNET at HERMES.GWU.EDU Subject: The case for drones. Comments please. Reply-To: Amitai Etzioni <icps at GWU.EDU>

Jane Mayer made the liberal case against drones in The New Yorker (October 26, 2009). We provide a blow by blow response here and discuss the issue on Talk of the Nation, here. Everyone is entitled to human rights, but we cannot wait for terrorists to strike before we go after them. And, although little known, the US military has a carefully crafted procedure for determining which drone strikes are allowed and which would cause too much collateral damage.

The onus for avoiding collateral damage altogether is on the terrorists. They have to stop exploiting their status as civilians, stop using civilians as human shields, and homes--as headquarters, as locations to store ammunition and for snipers to ply their deadly trade. (For more, see Security First: For a Muscular, Moral Foreign Policy [Yale 2007] and our website.) -- Amitai Etzioni University Professor The George Washington University 1922 F St NW, Rm 413 Washington, DC 20052 ph: 202.994.8190 fax: 202.9941606



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list