>From that pov, if 9/11 were a false flag, it would be unprecedented in
history because of the number of casualties it produced. Therefore, it is
highly unlikely that it was a false flag - except perhaps for paranoid
minds.
Wojtek
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Matt <lbo4 at beyondzero.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:14:21PM -0400, Shane Mage wrote:
>
> > Especially since nobody put any effort into "proving" the guilt of "Al
> > Qaeda" but they all put very great effort (the "9/11 Commission of
> > Inquiry")into covering up the truth about whatever actually happened.
>
> If you state that you have no idea what actually happened to the
> WTC ("whatever actually happened"), how can you be certain a theory
> consistent with the data that is widely accepted, is wrong ("covering
> up the truth")?
>
>
> Matt
>
> --
> GnuPG Key ID: 0xC33BD882
> aim/google/MSN/yahoo: beyondzero123
>
> There are only two kinds of artists: the plagiarists
> and the revolutionaries.
> -Paul Gauguin
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>