> So either one is arguing for meritocracy (who did that?) or we accept
> and advocate for people performing below their full potential.
I don't have any problem making that choice at all. Whence the imperative to "perform at full potential"? When was that added to the Decalogue?
Underachievers of the world -- slack off!
--
Michael Smith mjs at smithbowen.net http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
"I am in favor of leaving people alone, no matter how imperfect their polity may seem." -- Stephen Maturin, MD