On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Joseph Catron <jncatron at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would say that the fact that our Forest Service is part of a Department
> of
> Agriculture is a pretty qualitative difference.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Alan Rudy wrote:
> >
> What I've noticed is that you've yet to claim that the Forest Service in
> >> the
> >> US is qualitatively different - with the emphasis on qualitative - from
> >> its
> >> parallel institution in Sweden...
> >>
> >
> > But isn't the US Forest Service quite explicitly at the service (witness
> > more than a century of bitter conflict with the National Parks Service)
> of
> > the Timber Companies with no concern whatever for the environment or even
> > long-term productivity? Do you claim that such has always been the case
> in
> > Sweden?
> >
>
> --
> "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen
> lytlað."
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- ********************************************************* Alan P. Rudy Dept. Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work Central Michigan University 124 Anspach Hall Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 517-881-6319