[lbo-talk] Tea Party: less than meets the eye

c b cb31450 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 5 13:25:25 PDT 2010


Dennis Claxton

At 09:45 AM 11/5/2010, c b wrote:


>In the election, it was the upsurge of the right that had the most impact,

The fact that it was a mid-term election is what had the most impact. There is nothing unusual about what happened.

^^^^ CB: On this thread that means that not carrying out the programs Marv and Alan sketched was not the cause of the Dems losses either. So, why didn't you write the above as a reply to their comments when they appeared on the list ?

^^^^^

^^^^^^^


>Believe me. The vast majority of Black ( and probably most Brown )
>people disagree with you on this point. People who don't even usually
>talk about politics, relatively apolitical people, are coming up to
>me and talking about the racism against Obama.

Come on Charles. That's no more convincing than saying --- on the day after the gay marriage prop was defeated in California --- that it was because the "vast majority of black people" were against it. It was impossible to know that so soon and it turns out it wasn't true. What you're saying is based on nothing more than anecdotes.

^^^^^^^ CB: I'm betting that my anecdotes a very good representative samples of the Black population. Also, it is reported by polling statisticians that Black people polled and voted Democrat majorly. That's indirect evidence.They certainly don't think Obama failed them.

So, you really think that Black people don't think the Tea Party and Republican voters are racistly motivated against Obama ? Lets make a bet. A poll of Black opinion may very well come out. Bet !



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list