[lbo-talk] Tea Party: less than meets the eye

123hop at comcast.net 123hop at comcast.net
Sat Nov 6 11:07:07 PDT 2010


----- Original Message ----- From: "Wojtek S" <wsoko52 at gmail.com>

[WS:] Do you have any empirical evidence of this [that O energized a base and drew voters], as opposed to the alternative hypothesis: that voters wanted to "punish" the party in power by voting for a challenger? The latter only assumes that if things are going south, the electorate will vote against the party in power - which is "received wisdom" in policy analysis - the former requires an additional assumptions about political preferences of the electorate, which requires empirical proof. Can you cite any?

-------- The 2008 election is the only election I can remember in which many hi-tech and professional workers that I know took what little vacation time they had to go into the south and midwest to register/organize voters.

Obama's refusal to keep these people mobilized after the election speaks volumes about whom he served and who, he thought, should serve him.

I would be more likely to support your thesis Woj if O were not black and if I had not witnessed an unprecedented political engagement on the part of those who are normally blissfully detached from any part of the process except voting.

Joanna



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list