On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Marv Gandall <marvgand at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Some Democrats want to take a stand, win or lose, for any option that
> could depict Republicans as patrons of the richest taxpayers, at the expense
> of blocking continued tax cuts for the middle class. Others have no appetite
> left for combat."
>
> -- "Democrats Divided on Tax Cut Strategy", New York Times, November 6,
> 2010
>
> If the Obama administration is true to form, it won't take a stand. If the
> liberal wing of the party is true to form, it will criticize the
> administration for missing another opportunity to pass good policy and to
> portray the Republicans as the party of the rich. If Carrol is true to form,
> he will say it's "silly" to concern ourselves with an irrelevant issue which
> has nothing to do with the more important task of building a revolutionary
> vanguard. If Woj and Charles are true to form, they will indicate they
> favour taking a stand, but will support the administration for not taking a
> stand, and join with it in vilifying the liberal Democratic critics of the
> administration as ultra-left.
>
> Have I got any of this wrong?
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- ********************************************************* Alan P. Rudy Dept. Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work Central Michigan University 124 Anspach Hall Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 517-881-6319