On Nov 19, 2010, at 3:49 PM, SA wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 3:38 PM, Michael Pollak wrote:
>
>> So does this mean the whole idea that you can interpret progressive business vs. reactionary business during this archetypal period as an opposition between big capital and small capital doesn't factually hold water?
>
> That's right.
What's good to read about this period?
Doug