[lbo-talk] Why Semiotext(e) Are Reactionary Douchebags

[B.]

Oh come on - Semiotext(e) have some cool stuff you won't find anywhere else; to 
wit, Michel Foucault's _Remarks on Marx_, a collection of his (evolving and 
conflicted) takes on Marxism. There is still an enormous need for a reprint of 
this book, as I think leftists (and anyonne) could really use a handy 
all-in-one-place guide to Foucault and Marx, in the same way AK Press finally 
put out the _Chomsky on Anarchism_ compilation.

As far as Sloterdijk, I also was able to snag a copy of his _Critique of Cynical 
Reason_, but by the University of Minnesota Press, 1988 edition. Maybe U of MN 
is also crypto-fascist? And does anyone know if Sloterdijk's "Rules for the 
HUman Zoo" has a proper English translation...?

-B.

----- Original Message ----
From: James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Sent: Thu, October 14, 2010 2:22:09 PM
Subject: [lbo-talk] Why Semiotext(e) Are Reactionary Douchebags

'Because they publish the reactionary neo-liberal "philosopher" Peter 
Sloterdijk' writes Angelus Novis

Still, I enjoyed his Critique of Cynical Reason...