This confirms my long held belief that a rational discussion between liberals and conservatives is pointless, because cognitive frames used to form each point of view (or "motivated cognition" in psychological parlance) are a priori determinants of how information is being processed - i.e. deciding what is relevant and what is not and how the relevant information is arranged and interpreted. Therefore, any information obtained in a discussion will be either deemed irrelevant by the other side or interpreted in a manner that is consistent with his own cognitive framework. This is especially true of conservatives who tend to be more cognitively rigid than liberals.
Another point - cognitive conservatives are not necessarily limited to the political right. There are also on the political left. They tend to be lumped together with liberals because they typically stay in the same political encampment - but they have more in common with the conservatives on the other side of the front line than with the liberals in their own camp. David Horowitz is a case in point.
Wojtek
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Ismail Lagardien <ilagardien at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Researchers have identified a gene that can influence political preferences.
>
> http://www.world-science.net/othernews/101028_liberal
>
>
> Ismail Lagardien
> Department of Politics and Public Administration
>
> Elon University
> Elon, NC
> 27244
>
> Tel: +1(612) 227-5037 (Personal)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>