In re: the DRD4 gene: does the following suggest anything about how Fowler might be thinking about the "liberal" gene? From wikipedia - "As with other dopamine receptor <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine_receptor> subtypes, the D4receptor is activated by the neurotransmitter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotransmitter> dopamine<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine>. It is linked to many neurological and psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia>, Parkinsons disease <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinsons_disease>, bipolar disorder<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_disorder>, addictive behaviors including sex addiction<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_addiction>, and eating disorders <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_disorders> such as anorexia nervosa <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anorexia_nervosa>, bulimia nervosa <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulimia_nervosa> and binge eating<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binge_eating>. It has also been linked with novelty seeking<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novelty_seeking>and liberalism <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism> [2]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine_receptor_D4#cite_note-drd4liberalism-1>. It is a target for drugs which treat schizophrenia<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia>and Parkinson disease <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson_disease>."
Last, go here: http://www.world-science.net/ and tell me that the huge percentage of biologically determined social phenomena - plus the lack of an About Us or Who We Are page - doesn't raise flags.
If he were dead, Dick Lewontin'd be rolling over in his grave to see lefties embracing this pile of hooey.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
> How can you be so sure that something does not exist?
>
> Wojtek
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Eubulides <autoplectic at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This confirms my long held belief that a rational discussion between
> >> liberals and conservatives is pointless, because cognitive frames used
> >> to form each point of view (or "motivated cognition" in psychological
> >> parlance) are a priori determinants of how information is being
> >> processed - i.e. deciding what is relevant and what is not and how the
> >> relevant information is arranged and interpreted. Therefore, any
> >> information obtained in a discussion will be either deemed irrelevant
> >> by the other side or interpreted in a manner that is consistent with
> >> his own cognitive framework. This is especially true of conservatives
> >> who tend to be more cognitively rigid than liberals.
> >
> > ==============
> >
> > There are no a priori determinants of how information is processed.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- ********************************************************* Alan P. Rudy Dept. Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work Central Michigan University 124 Anspach Hall Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 517-881-6319