On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> One point about the BPP and its tactics I am trying to develop in more
> detail in another post I'm working on. _All_ the tactics developed in all
> phases of the Black Movement shared one crucial aim, that of building up the
> courage of the Black Nation! This is what also runs through the songs on the
> record Elaine Brown made. This aim was in fact also really at the heart of
> the stunt in Bloomington of trying to put a Black Santa in the Christmas
> Parade. They had the whole damn police department mobilized to keep him out
> of it. So he followed behind (leading my 10-year old daughter by the hand).
> We got a write up in Jet. And Bloomington has never had a Christmas Parade
> since then. Merlin Kennedy, the Santa, felt good; everyone in our group
> felt good, and the Black Community in Bloomington _also_ felt _very_ good
> about it. The point was the same, really, as the Panthers with guns. Stand
> up! You are men. (Word deliberate: that was the one _real_ weakness of the
> Panthers, their attitude towards women. They were trying to correct it
> toward the end.) This theme of _standing up_ echoes through all the songs in
> Elaine Brown's LP. And it was the prime message Rosa Parks delivered in
> refusing to stand up. We have had enough. We demand our humanity be
> recognized. The Panthers _had_ to do what they did. It was the climax of the
> Black Movement, recognized as such by millins of Blacks who themselves were
> not activists at all.
>
> Carrol
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Chuck Grimes
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 5:33 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Black Panther Coloring Book
>
> .The Panthers were a continuation, NOTa rejection, of the Civil Rights
> Movement at which Chuck sneers. That sneer would have outraged the Panthers.
>
> Other aspects of Chuck's post are more complicated, and I hope to return to
> them in another post.
>
> Carrol
>
> -----------
>
> I agree they were a continuation, and I am sorry, if it sounded like a
> sneer. There was a strange kind of continum, or mood swing going on, and it
> still goes on with me.. I both reject and embrace violent means or reject
> and embrace peaceful means to political and economic change. I more or less
> figured these were not necessarily in opposition. Rather we probably need
> both to re-enforce each other.
>
> These have different tactical uses. For example, a peaceful sit-in does a
> miracle job of illustrating the true source of violence are the cops and the
>
> state. On the other hand a scary violent riot reminds the cops and state,
> that social order and its power is in the hands of the people.
>
> CG
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598 Static Web Page: http://www.nohairshirts.com