SA wrote:
>
> On 9/2/2010 4:37 PM, 123hop at comcast.net wrote:
>
>[clip]
>
> Huh.
>
> Man, the sixties sound pretty nice.
Joanna speaks of what was _fought_ for rather than necessarily achieved -- not an uncommon condition. And she describes fairly accurately what was, in various forms, fought for.
And it doesn't matter that many of those goals were badly formulated or contradictory -- the activity left its imprint on expectations -- though by the mid-decade those expectatins were being reformulated in practice to conservative ends. E.g., negative reaction to _corporate_ bureaucracy shifted to varius state bureaucracies.
I'm not certain of this, but her post, right or wrong, hardly deserves a Huh? And your next remark is merely empty.
Carrol