[lbo-talk] Von Hayek was wrong

Gar Lipow gar.lipow at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 15:43:38 PDT 2011


On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, c b <cb31450 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It might help to look into the history of the term "scab".   "Scabs"
> in labor history are almost always people who are significantly poor,
> and therefore due sympathy for that poverty. However, one can be
> sympathetic for their poverty and look at the objective effect of
> their personally desperate action  on the working class and trade
> union movement , and on Solidarity.
>
> Charles

But "scab" referred to people who replace striking workers, who acted to undermine organized struggles. It also sometimes referred to official and unofficial thugs (police, military, private for hire groups like the Pinkertons, umpaid volunteer thugs like the American Legion who were violent strikebreakers). In spite of Jack London's use of the word in a broader context it normally did not apply to people who worked more cheaply than norm or worked harder than the norm in the absence of such struggle. For that matter Martin Eden was explicitly asked by fellow workers not to work so hard. So even there, he acted against calls for solidarity from an informal organization. Why is it scabbing to work for free if it advances your personal self-interest in the absence of an organized movement asking you to do otherwise?


> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

-- Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598 Static page: http://www.nohairshirts.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list