[lbo-talk] the decline of men

[shag carpet bomb]

At 06:06 PM 4/13/2011, Michael Smith wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
>123hop at comcast.net wrote:
>
> > Do you think this means that men will have to learn to be better lovers?
>
>Either they have, or some women (at least) have learned to be more
>easily pleased. Remember that Duke University girl a few months
>back, with the Powerpoint bedmate report? She seems to have had
>a whale of a time with precisely the sort of guys who used to
>be the most oafish 'lovers' going -- or at least, so I been told;
>namely, 18-21 year-old jocks.

Did you see some analyses of this, though, where someone suggested that 
what was more likely was that she was getting back at these guys. In this 
day and age, among that population, it's pretty uncommon to think you can 
facebook something and it'll never get around. I don't think she had such a 
great time so much as she was interested in pretending that it was all 
about posing as if she was above it all, unhurt by the way they treated 
her, so she could make fools out of some of the worst of the bunch. Hard to 
say. I thought that perspective was an interesting take, though.

shag


>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

--
http://cleandraws.com
Wear Clean Draws
('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)