On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, James Leveque posted a link from Glenn Greenwald:
> (And the notion that Ellsberg's leak was limited and highly selective is
> absurd; he passed on thousands of pages to the *New York Times* in the form
> of 42 full volumes worth. Among the documents leaked by Ellsberg were some
> of the *nation's most sensitive cryptography and eavesdropping
> methods*<http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526&context=wmborj&sei-redir=1#search=%22james+bamford+pentagon+papers+crytography%22>:
> documents *The New York Times* withheld from publication upon the NSA's
> insistence that their publication would gravely harm American national
> security [see p. 388 and fn
> 170<http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1526&context=wmborj&sei-redir=1#search=%22james+bamford+pentagon+papers+crytography%22>].
Has anyone made sense of these references? AFAICT, the article referenced only has 114 pdf pages, so what's p. 388? And the first initiates a search for bamford+cryptography+pentagon+papers that turns up zero hits.
Michael