> Seth wrote:
>
>> I'm asking you as an economist: If this were true (Michael's "reverse finance capital"), what sort of pattern would we expect to find in the data?
> Do you mean an out-of-trend switching of jobs into the "financial
> industry" (and in other industries' "financial" functions) from other
> private-business employment?
Hey, good idea, Julio! Let's try that!
Here's a chart that shows the finance industry's shares of employees and fixed investment, from 1948-2009:
Note that the employee data is collected at the *establishment* level. That means employees of GE Capital or the Sears finance dept are classified as finance, not manufacturing or retail. The investment data is collected at the company level - yet the two trends move basically in tandem anyway.
[Note: The series breaks are due to slight changes industry definitions for the employee series. The investment series is consistent.]
Now: what if anything does this tell us about the validity of Michael's claim that "When few good prospects for real investment exist, people look for financial opportunities"?
SA