What makes you think this is true? Is it a hunch? A hypothesis? Just some barstool shit-shooting?
I'm asking you as an economist: If this were true, what sort of pattern would we expect to find in the data?
SA
^^^^ CB; Didn't the Rockefeller folks go from oil to banking ? Carnegie ? Would that be evidence ?
Maybe it's not when there are few good prospects , but just "naturally" ,because M-M(1) is a more efficient way to make profit than M-C-M(1).