> On Aug 14, 2011, at 2:31 PM, socialismorbarbarism wrote:
>
>> I mean, I know its typical, but the "progressive" folks didn't even
>> bother to hide it.
>
> Standard "movement" labor conditions. You're supposed to do it for the love.
I get the "movement" cynicism, but (to quote): "What's so funny 'bout peace, love and understanding?" I mean, sure, maybe the check will ultimately bounce, but isn't the idea that we have to "do it for the love" only until we make the revolution? And what's wrong with "doing it for the love," anyway - even if you ultimately end up nailed to a cross, or shot through the head? ("Back, and to the left.") You'd rather die slowly in a hospital bed? (All things being equal, I would too - surrounded by a worshipful extended family and several hundred adoring friends. But all things are not equal, and I'm not that good.)
I spent last evening with a good friend whose mother (may she rest in peace) knew Che. As my friend's mother related the story, he was the most magnetic, appealing - and, yes, sexy - person she'd ever met (and she'd met a lot of pretty exceptional people). Said that when he walked into a room, it was immediately filled with palpable, pulsing, revolutionary love. Are we uncomfortable with that, or do we simply not believe in it?
And who the fuck are WBAI to make anybody feel like an "employee" anyway? Update your contingency plans, apologise to your relations and / or neighbours for any past offense (so they'll take care of your kids in an emergency), take the fucking job, and go in there and kick some ass. They want you to work long hours? Work even longer hours than they ever imagined. But work smart, and work like you deserve to own the place. Document everything. Then leverage your contribution into influence: put in the hours that will earn you the cred to start making the calls that matter. Work so hard and "network" so effectively (yes, you can do this without becoming bourg) that they'd never *dare* fire you, because you'd've done the groundwork to rally listeners, advertisers, colleagues, donors, media, etc. (these are all temporary, pre-revolutionary designations).
As long as you see yourself as merely an "employee," you're bound to be treated as nothing more than that. "The most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed." (Biko)
Or am I missing something - I mean, other than the hopeless cynicism?
What, somebody thought making the revolution was a 9-to-5?