[lbo-talk] posh as fuck

James Heartfield Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk
Sun Dec 4 10:50:43 PST 2011


The British university system was indeed generously supported for home students in the period up to the mid-1980s. Fees and a maintenance award were paid (I was a lucky recipient of this system). However, it was in no sense socialistic, or even egalitarian. Rather, the allocation of places in Higher education were limited so that the subsidies were mostly paid to those who did well at school (and who could afford to live without bringing a full wage in for three years). About one per cent of those aged 18-21 went to university in the 1960s. Schooling in the UK (and I guess in most places) was essentially a system for sifting the middle classes (sorry, I know that term means something slightly different in the UK from the US) from the working classes, so the recipients of these subsidies were for the most part middle class. As was often said at the time, that was the secret of the British welfare state – the middle classes got a lot more out of it than the working classes did.

The system was substantially overhauled with the great expansion in Higher Education places in the 1980s. The main driver of this expansion was demand, because Britons were less sure of collective action to secure incomes, they got correspondingly more interested in individual solutions, like pushing their children to get degrees. With a sharp intuition, the Conservative government of the time realised that this greater demand for university education was worth yielding too (since it was in keeping with their own individualistic ideology). At the same time they understood that more university places could be created while pushing the cost onto the students (and their parents), because they were holding them to ransom by their fears for losing out in the jobs race.

What that looked like was the abolition of the maintenance grant, moderated with the introduction with a government-backed student loan scheme, and then later a similar introduction of fees (again backed by loans). These loans are recovered through the income tax.

The goal of protecting one’s future by getting a degree was in the end self-defeating, since the degree worked as a credential that gave you access to relative advantage in the professions, but with the increase in the number of degrees, their relative value decreased. Many professional or administrative jobs now demand Masters degrees.

A cynic pointed out to me that the government’s recent introduction of full-cost fees (again backed by government supported loans) was less a tax on students and more the creation of a guaranteed tranche of debt for the banks to distribute, so easing the ‘credit crunch’.

Overall, though, I think the point is right. Before the introduction of fees, the British University system was on the whole a subsidy to a narrowly-drawn group of privileged middle classes.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list