> Well, thank goodness I was putting forth just the argument you say I was
> making... otherwise you'd have no point to make.
>
> And thank goodness you cleared up the fact that an argument which
> denigrates defending the repeatedly dissed "status quo" also means
> supporting resistance to neoliberalism, 'cuz they sound different to me.
I'm finding some of this rather hard to parse. May one ask what subject you teach?
> Last point, as Doug pointed out moments ago... there's this guy, who's like
> famous and stuff on the left, who wrote a great deal about imminence
Oh, you meant imm_a_nent. With an A. Hadn't realized. I was barking up the leaning tree (minens) rather than the abiding tree (manens).
-- --
Michael J. Smith mjs at smithbowen.net
http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://www.cars-suck.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
Any proposition that seems self-evident is almost certainly false.