[lbo-talk] why Paul is a fascist

martin schiller mschiller at pobox.com
Fri Dec 23 09:40:48 PST 2011


On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Joseph Catron wrote:


> Well, why not? Clearly it's now a meaningless word, emptied of all content;
> it would probably be futile for any of us to swim against the tide.

My read of the wiki 'fascism' page informs me that the word has lots of definitions - if anything it is overflowing with content, which tide is sweeping discussion along.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list