On Dec 28, 2011, at 10:21 AM, nathan tankus wrote:
> "I'd like to develop this, and I'm away from the book and my mind is
> on vacation, but does Graeber really distinguish how debt works under
> capitalism from how it works in non-capitalist societies? "
>
> I think so.
But this is pretty ancient stuff that you quote. And mostly the debt = bondage aspects. The notion of credit stretching the limits to capital is missing, isn't it?
Doug