> general claim.
What we know so far:
Analytical thinking: Very little learning. Other types of thinking: Unknown.
This paints an unhappy portrait.
I really don't understand why we should be unhappy.
Only a very small number of students become electronic engineers. We should be unhappy?
What if what is crudely called "analytic thinking" is merely a skill not as much in demand as you and others quite _unanalytically_ just take for granted. I believe the study showed that some fairly substantial percentage did show this kind of learning. How do you know that that is not all we need.
Carrol