[lbo-talk] Former UK Home and Defense Minister: All drugs should be legalized

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 07:04:32 PST 2011


[WS:] Of course, similar sensible arguments on this side of the pond did not get very far. This raises the question who opposes legalization (other than the dealers) and for what real reasons? Many years ago I read a journal article analyzing the history of substance prohibition in the US and arguing that these efforts often targeted substances used by new immigrant populations (opium - Chinese; alcohol - Eastern Europeans, cannabis - Mexican) suggesting that this was a part of anti-immigrant campaigns. But that explanation raises several questions: 1. The Prohibition was abolished after a while, so why not delegalization of other substances? 2. Why are substances used by the white native population (e.g. meth) also illegal? 3. Why did other countries where there is no correlation between immigrant/racial minority groups and substance use also ban these substances?

Wojtek

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Michael Pollak <mpollak at panix.com> wrote:


>
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/all-drugs-should-be-legalised-to-beat-dealers-says-former-minister-2161635.html
>
> Michael
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list