[lbo-talk] Krugman: "The question then is why."

// ravi ravi at platosbeard.org
Wed Jul 13 22:02:28 PDT 2011

Previous message: [lbo-talk] Krugman: "The question then is why."
Next message: [lbo-talk] Krugman: "The question then is why."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Search LBO-Talk Archives

Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by: Reverse Sort

On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:59 AM, // ravi wrote:
> I do agree with you and Doug - and disagree with my friend Joanna - that Obama wouldn’t have been elected had his true nature been evident

Correction: “I do agree with you and Doug that Obama would have been elected even if his true nature had been evident”.

—ravi

Previous message: [lbo-talk] Krugman: "The question then is why."
Next message: [lbo-talk] Krugman: "The question then is why."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the lbo-talk mailing list