Regarding the book itself, Sraffa made no attempt to make it readable.
It is reduced to pure logic, perhaps reflecting his close association with Wittgenstein.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Jim Farmelant <farmelantj at juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Jim Farmelant quoted Joan Robinson:
>>
>> > The radical has to be well versed in Sraffa
>> > and Kalecki if he is going to take them on.
>>
>> I've tried several times to read Sraffa and was bored to death. What
>> am I missing?
>
> I never tried tackling Sraffa. Kalecki seems much more readable IMO.
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
530 898 5321 fax 530 898 5901 http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com